+ Voigtlander 75/f2.5 + Leica Summarex 85/f1.5 + Leica APO 90/f2 ASPH. + Leica 50/f1.5 + Zeiss ZM Sonnar 50/f1.5 + Leica APO Summicron 50/f2 + Leica Summitar 50/f2 + Leica Rigid Summicron 50/f2 + Zeiss ZM Planar 50/f2 + Leica 50/f2.8 E39 + Leica 75/f1.4 + Leica APO 75/f2 ASPH. FLE + Leica Noctilux 50/f0.95 + Leica Noctilux 50/f1 + Canon 50/f1.2 LTM + Leica 50/f1.4 ASPH. M mount Lenses: Super-Wide Heliar 15/f4.5 ASPH. Nice fun to mount on bellows and shot macros when spring/summer arrivesĪnalogue Rangefinders: Leica M5, Leica M6 Titanium classic 0.72, Leica M7 0.58, Leica M7 0.85ĭigital Rangefinder: Leica M9, Leica Monochrom, Leica M240 Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm Maker is Staeble (later bought by Agfa) btw. If I'm correct there very a few versions of that one.
Noflexar system lens construction schematics iso#
Here some samples (with high ISO and without hood direct comparision with other lenses it shows a very great ability to capture very fine details (high microcontrast) I have a pretty modern one - looks exactly like latest 105/5.6 enlarging lens I might have just had a dog of a copy, it was constructed differently to the other Rodenstock enlarging lenses I've had or have, I don't think it was a plasmat type as the front element was a single one and in a plasmat it would be a cemented doublet, so that suggests it is a different optical formula to the 'normal' plasmat type enlarging Rodagons. It had a red band around it and I've since learnt that the Rodagons with red bands aren't enlarging lenses, they are graphics arts lenses. Which version of the Rodagon do you have? I had a Rodagon, either 100 or 105mm, I forget, maybe 90mm it wasn't impressive at all. Nex5, Olympus EPM1, yashica half 14, Canon eos 650 want to see samples of mine? please click My lenses If you enjoyed this lens, you should try Rodagon 105/5.6 It kills the Noflexar in all optical aspects except maybe flaring, bokeh and speed. Last edited by iangreenhalgh1 on Tue 9:23 am edited 1 time in total I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! It had a red band around it and I might have just had a dog of a copy, it was constructed differently to the other Rodenstock enlarging lenses I've had or have, I don't think it was a plasmat type as the front element was a single one and in a plasmat it would be a cemented doublet, so that suggests it is a different optical formula to the 'normal' plasmat type enlarging Rodagons. Iangreenhalgh1 wrote: Yes, these are made by Staeble who were part of Agfa after a buyout (in the 60s, if I remember right) and who also made some excellent repro lenses variously labelled Eskophot, Helioprint, Repromaster and Staeble, they perform like Schneider G-Clarons but are tricky to use as they won't go in shutter without machinist work. Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 EDĪttila wrote: I like this lens much, no idea who made it, lens label says Novoflexar.įorenSeil wrote: If you enjoyed this lens, you should try Rodagon 105/5.6 It kills the Noflexar in all optical aspects except maybe flaring, bokeh and speed. These were all made by Staeble for Novoflex, correct?Ĭurrent favourite lenses (I have many more):Ī few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10 The 105mm looks like much more fun than the 60mm from what I can see here. I only had the Novoflex 60/4 bellows head. Strangelove wrote: great set! 3 & 12 are my favorites Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
0 kommentar(er)
